CLARK
v.
FITZGERALD
CLARK
FITZGERALD
171 U.S. 92
Supreme Court of the United States (1898)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 43 L. Ed. 87 · 18 S. Ct. 941 · 1898 U.S. LEXIS 1588 · SCDB 1897-160
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court.
.The case is before us on error to the Supreme Court of Montana. It is unnecessary to state its facts in detail, and it is sufficient to say that the answer given to the fourth question in the opinion just filed in Del Monte Mining Co. v. Last Chance Mining Co., ante, 55, compels an affirmance of the judgment.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Humbird v. Avery, 195 U.S. 480 (U.S. 1904)
-
T. & M. Transp. Co. v. S. W. Shattuck Chem. Co., 158 F.2d 909 (10th Cir. 1947)…ity in the nature of money due on account, the allowance of interest from the respective dates on which the respective undercharges arose is mandatory. City of Denver v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., 10 Cir., 141 F. 69, certiorari denied, 170 U.S. 705, 18 S.Ct. 941, 42 L.Ed. 1218. The judgment is attacked on the further ground that the court erred in failing to tax against the shipper the costs incurred on the first appeal. The shipper took that appeal and prevailed. The judgment was reversed and the cause re…