HENDERSON BRIDGE COMPANY
v.
HENDERSON CITY
HENDERSON BRIDGE COMPANY
HENDERSON CITY
173 U.S. 624
Supreme Court of the United States (1898)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 43 L. Ed. 835 · 19 S. Ct. 877 · 1899 U.S. LEXIS 1465 · SCDB 1898-116
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Harlan :
This was an action by the city of Henderson to recover taxes (with interest and penalties) assessed by it upon the property of the Henderson Bridge Company within the limits of that city for the years 1890,1891,1892 and 1893. The case presents substantially the same questions that are disposed of in the opinion just delivered in case No. 32 between the same parties for taxes for the years 1888 and 1889. For..the reasons stated in that opinion the judgment of the Court of Appeals of Kentucky in the present case must be
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Pink, 315 U.S. 203 (U.S. 1942)…may refuse to give effect to a transfer made elsewhere of property which is within its own territorial limits. Green v. Van Buskirk, 6 Wall. 307, 311-12; Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive Works, 93 U. S. 664; Security Trust Co. v. Dodd, Mead & Co., 173 U. S. 624; Clark v. Williard, 292 U. S. 112, 122; Clark v. Williard, 294 U. S. 211. So far is a state free in this respect that the full faith and credit clause does not preclude the attachment by local creditors of the property within the state of a foreign…
-
United States v. Belmont, 301 U.S. 324 (U.S. 1937)…of property which is within its own territorial limits, if the transfer is in conflict with its public policy. Green v. Van Buskirk, 5 Wall. 307, 311-312; Hervey v. Rhode Island Locomotive Works, 93 U. S. 664; Security Trust Co. v. Dodd, Mead & Co., 173 U. S. 624; Clark v. Williard, 292 U. S. 112, 122; Clark v. Williard, 294 U. S. 211. It is likewise free to disregard the transfer where the subject of it is a chose in action due from a debtor within the state to a foreign creditor, especially where, as in t…
-
Clark v. Williard, 292 U.S. 112 (U.S. 1934)…a juristic person, confer upon the receiver or assignee a title which, generally speaking, is without recognition outside of the state of his appointment except in subordination to the claims of local creditors. Security Trust Co. v. Dodd, Mead Co., 173 U.S. 624; Cole v. Cunningham, 133 U.S. 107; Oakey v. Bennett, 11 How. 33, 44; Barth v. Backus, 140 N.Y. 230; 35 N.E. 425; Ward v. Connecticut Pipe Mfg. Co., 71 Conn. 345; 41 Atl. 1057; Gilbert v. Hewetson, 79 Minn. 326; 82 N.W. [*122] 655. Upon the strength…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence