STONE, AUDITOR,
v.
FARMERS' BANK OF KENTUCKY; FARMERS' BANK OF KENTUCKY V. STONE, AUDITOR

U.S. | 1899-05-15
Nos. 385, 386
174 U.S. 409 Supreme Court of the United States (1899) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 43 L. Ed. 1027 · 19 S. Ct. 880 · 1899 U.S. LEXIS 1503 · SCDB 1898-147
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice White,

Mr. Justice White,

after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

The decree below, so far as it granted the relief prayed as against the defendants other than the city of Georgetown and the county of Scott, is affirmed by a divided court. The decree, so far as it adjudicated against the complainant and in favor of the defendants the city of Georgetown and the county of Scott, those defendants not having been parties or privies to the judgments pleaded as res judicata, must be affirmed upon the authority of the decision in Citizens’ Savings Bank of Owensboro v. City of Owensboro and A. M. C. Simmons, Tax Collector, 173 U. S. 636.

And it is so ordered.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Blonder-Tongue Labs., Inc. v. Univ. of Ill. Found., 402 U.S. 313 (U.S. 1971)
    …ame general field, and it has been fully briefed and argued by the parties and amici. See Moragne, 398 U. S., at 378-380, n. 1; cf. NLRB v. Pittsburgh S. S. Co., 337 U. S. 656, 661-662 (1949). See also 225 U. S., at 130-131; Stone v. Farmers’ Bank, 174 U. S. 409 (1899); Keokuk & W. R. Co. v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 301, 317 (1894); Litchfield v. Goodnow, 123 U. S. 549, 552 (1887). Bigelow also spent some time discussing one of the many exceptions to the mutuality requirement, 225 U. S., at 127-128. These “excep…
  • Standefer v. United States, 447 U.S. 10 (U.S. 1980)
    …. See n. 6, supra. In 1912, in Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Co., 225 U. S. 111, 127, this Court stated that it was “a principle of general elementary law that the estoppel of a judgment must be mutual.” See also Stone v. Farmers Bank of Kentucky, 174 U. S. 409 (1899); Keokuk & Western R. Co. v. Missouri, 152 U. S. 301, 317 (1894); Litchfield v. Goodnow, 123 U. S. 549, 552 (1887). Petitioner does not contend that the Constitution prevents the Government from prosecuting him on the three § 7214 (a) (2) cou…
  • United States v. Pink, 315 U.S. 203 (U.S. 1942)
    …York has the last word. But it does not follow, as respondent urges, that the writ should be dismissed as improvidently granted. The Moscow case is not res judicata, since respondent was not a party to that suit. Stone v. Farmers’ Bank of Kentucky, 174 U. S. 409; Rudd v. Cornell, 171 N. Y. 114, 127-128, 63 N. E. 2d 823; St. John v. Fowler, 229 N. Y. 270, 274, 128 N. E. 199. Nor was our affirmance of the judgment in that case by an equally divided court an authoritative precedent. While it was conclusive and…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw