NEELY
v.
HENKEL
NEELY
HENKEL
180 U.S. 126
Supreme Court of the United States (1901)
Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 45 L. Ed. 457 · 21 S. Ct. 308 · 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1289 · SCDB 1900-097
Cited by 92 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court.
The record in this case, it is admitted, shows the same state of facts as in the case just decided. .This was a second application. for a writ of habeas corpus, upon substantially the same grounds as were urged in the other case. The additional allegations in this application for the writ did not materially change the situation.
Eor the reasons stated in the opinion just delivered, the judgment of the Circuit Court is-
Affirmed,
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (34 total)
-
United States v. Jefferson Elec. Mfg. Co., 291 U.S. 386 (U.S. 1934)…, 123 U.S. 443, 505; Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 17-18; United States v. Heinszen & Co., 206 U.S. 370, 391 (Harlan, J.); Graham & Foster v. Goodcell, 282 U.S. 409, 430-431. 28 U.S.C. § 773; Copelin v. Insurance Co., 9 Wall. 461; Dooley v. Pease, 180 U.S. 126, 131. 28 U.S.C. § 879; Martinton v. Fairbanks, 112 U.S. 670, 672; Davis v. Schwartz, 155 U.S. 631, 636; Law v. United States, 266 U.S. 494, 496. 28 U.S.C. § 875.…
-
Thompson v. Fairbanks, 196 U.S. 516 (U.S. 1905)…t, 318, and other cases cited in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Whether and to what extent a mortgage of this kind is valid, is a local question/ and the decisions, of the state court will be followed by this court in such case. Dooley v. Pease, 180 U. S. 126. The question that remains is, whether the taking of posses [*523] sion after condition broken, of these mortgaged chattels before, and within four months of filing the petition in bankruptcy, was a violation of any of the provisions of the bankrup…
-
Sanders v. Leech, 158 F.2d 486 (5th Cir. 1946)…, 5 Cir., 101 F. 131; Reid v. Nelson, 5 Cir., 154 F. 2d 724; Home Ins. Co. of New York v. Tydal Co., 5 Cir., 152 F. 2d 309. 28 U.S.C.A. § 773 (R.S. 649), 875 (R.S. 700), 879 (R.S. 1011); Tyng v. Grinnell, 92 U.S. 467, 23 L.Ed. 733; Dooley v. Pease, 180 U.S. 126, 21 S.Ct. 329, 45 L.Ed. 457. In Security Nat. Bank v. Old Nat. Bank, 8 Cir., 241 F. 1, at page 6, the rule is thus expressed: “Whether or not they are supported by the agreed facts and the evidence is the question whether or not they are sustained…
Previewing 3 of 34 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence