ARMSTRONG
v.
UNITED STATES
ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES
182 U.S. 243
Supreme Court of the United States (1901)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 45 L. Ed. 1086 · 21 S. Ct. 827 · SCDB 1900-061 · 1901 U.S. LEXIS 1228
Cited by 32 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Brown delivered the opinion of the court.
This ease is controlled by the ease of Dooley v. United States, No. 501, just decided. So far as the duties were exacted upon goods imported prior to the ratification of the treaty of April 11, 1899, they were properly exacted. So far as they were imposed upon importations after that date and prior to December 5,1899, plaintiff is entitled to recover them back.
The judgment of the Court of Claims is therefore reversed and the case remanded to that court for fv/rther proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Examining Bd. of Eng'rs v. Flores de Otero, 426 U.S. 572 (U.S. 1976)…that have come to be known as the Insular Cases, the Court created the doctrine of incorporated and unincorporated Territories, e. g., De Lima v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 1 (1901); Dooley v. United States, 182 U. S. 222 (1901); Armstrong v. United States, 182 U. S. 243 (1901); Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 244 (1901). The former category encompassed those Territories destined for statehood from the time of acquisition, and the Constitution was applied to them with full force. See, e. g., Rassmussen v. United Stat…
-
Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (U.S. 2008)…s the Insular Cases, the Court addressed whether the Constitution, by its own force, applies in any territory that is not a State. See De Lima v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 1 (1901); Dooley v. United States, 182 U. S. 222 (1901); Armstrong v. United States, 182 U. S. 243 (1901); Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 244 (1901); Hawaii [*757] v. Mankichi, 190 U. S. 197 (1903); Dorr v. United States, 195 U. S. 138 (1904). The Court held that the Constitution has independent force in these Territories, a force not contingent up…
-
Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Al Kanahele, 857 F.2d 1245 (9th Cir. 1988)…ame before the Court in a series of decisions known as The Insular Cases. E.g., De Lima v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 1, 21 S.Ct. 743, 45 L.Ed. 1041 (1901); Dooley v. United States, 182 U.S. 222, 21 S.Ct. 762, 45 L.Ed.1074 (1901); Armstrong v. United States, 21 S.Ct. 827, 45 L.Ed. 1086 (1901); Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244, 21 S.Ct. 770, 45 L.Ed. 1088 (1901); see McKay, 35 Law & Contemp.Probs. at 31. .The Third Circuit listed a number of these instances in Scarfo: John Jay served simultaneously as the first Chie…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence