GALLAWAY

v.

FORT WORTH BANK

Citator

Cited By

• Weller v. Dickson, 314 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1963)
  …ly to civil cases. This was held not to apply to appeals or writs of error, either to the Circuit Court of Appeals (Bradford v. Southern Ry. Co., 1904, 195 U.S. 243, 25 S.Ct. 55, 49 L.Ed. 178) or the Supreme Court (Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank, 1902, 186 U.S. 177, 22 S.Ct. 811, 46 L. Ed. 1111). In Bradford, the Supreme Court said that the statute should be con [*604] strued strictly, because it allows a plaintiff to proceed “at the expense of others.” In Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co., 1915, 236 U.S. 43,…
• Bradford v. S. Ry. Co., 195 U.S. 243 (U.S. 1904)
  …were made to this court for leave to prosecute writs- of error or appeals in forma pauperis, and were uniformly denied, as we were of opinion that the act had no relation to proceedings in this court. And we so stated in Gallaway v. Fort Worth Bank, 186 U. S. 177, where leave was asked to prosecute a writ of error to a state court without giving security as required by section 1000 of the Revised Statutes. The ruling would have been the same if the review of the judgment or decree of a court of the United St…
• Dunn v. White, 880 F.2d 1188 (10th Cir. 1989)
  …itutional); Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11, 31, 38, 25 S.Ct. 358, 363, 366, 49 L.Ed. 643 (1905) (compulsory vaccination is constitutional); cf. Compagnie Francaise De Navigation a Vapeur v. Louisiana State Board of Health, 186 U.S. 380, 391, 22 S.Ct. 811, 816, 46 L.Ed. 1209 (1902) (use of quarantine power is constitutional absent conflict with Congressional enactment preempting state’s authority). For example, in Reynolds v. McNichols, 488 F. 2d 1378, 1382 (10th Cir.1973), this court, noting the e…