MISSOURI, KANSAS AND TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY

v.

TRUSKETT

Citator

Cited By

• FAY v. New York, 332 U.S. 261 (U.S. 1947)
  …ation of the Fourteenth Amendment because the jury was “taken from a particular body of citizens and not from the general body of the county as was provided in all cases wherein such special jury was not drawn.” This Court affirmed, Hall v. Johnson, 186 U. S. 480, citing [*270] among other authorities Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U. S. 172, which upheld a state statute for a “struck jury.”13 Since these decisions, the special jury has been in continuous use in New York County in important cases. The District At…
• Torres v. United States, 270 F.2d 252 (9th Cir. 1959)
  …cam [*257] era company, who had been with them for more than seven years, would be qualified to express an opinion as to the reasonable market value of the photographic equipment in question. See, e. g., Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Trus-kett, 1902, 186 U.S. 480, 22 S.Ct. 943, 46 L.Ed. 1259; Brooks Transp. Co. v. Mc-Cutcheon, 1946, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 406, 154 F. 2d 841; Keller v. F.T.C., 7 Cir., 1942, 132 F. 2d 59. She, in fact, testified that the equipment had a reasonable market value of $139 for the camera…
• Ark. Natural Gas Co. v. Sartor, 78 F.2d 924 (5th Cir. 1935)
  …. S. 348-353, 11 S. Ct. 96, 97, 34 L. Ed. 681, it was said: “At best, evidence of value is largely a matter of opinion.” See, also, Nelson v. First Nat. Bank (C. C. A.) 69 F. 798; Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Truskett (C. C. A.) 104 F. 728, affirmed 186 U. S. 480, 22 S. Ct. 943, 46 L. Ed. 1259; Julian Petroleum Corporation v. Courtney Petroleum Co. (C. C. A.) 22 F.(2d) 360; Jones' Evidence, Civil Cases, § 387. [*928] Applying these rules, it is apparent that the contracts offered by plaintiff were inadmissib…