CHARLES T. CARNAHAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
P. K. CONNOLLY
CHARLES T. CARNAHAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
P. K. CONNOLLY
187 U.S. 636
Supreme Court of the United States (1902)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 23 S. Ct. 844 · 47 L. Ed. 344 · 1902 U.S. LEXIS 2226 · SCDB 1902-251
Cited by 14 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Writs of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Harrison v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38; Erie Railroad Company v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148, and other cases; and see Carnahan v. Connolly, 68 Pac. Rep. 836.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Miller v. Stock, 65 F.2d 773 (3d Cir. 1933)…in the litigation that may ensue. He may make it at such time as he may deem proper, and upon such data as shall be satisfactory to him.” In Deweese v. Smith (C. C. A.) 106 F. 438, 445, 66 L. R. A. 971, affirmed in 187 U. S. 637, 23. S. Ct. 845, 47 L. Ed. 344, it is said: “But this question is not open to litigation in this case. Under the acts of congress and the decisions of the courts to which reference has been made the comptroller of the currency constitutes a quasi judicial tribunal, to whose exclu…
-
Schram v. Schwartz, 68 F.2d 699 (2d Cir. 1934)…nk v. Case, 99 U. S. 628, 634, 635, 25 L. Ed. 448; United States ex rel. Citizens’ Nat. Bank v. Knox, 102 U. S. 422, 426, 26 L. Ed. 216; Bushnell v. Leland, 164 U. S. 684, 17 S. Ct. 209, 41 L. Ed. 598; Deweese v. Smith, 187 U. S. 637, 23 S. Ct. 845, 47 L. Ed. 344, affirming without opinion 106 F. 438, 66 L. R. A. 971 (C. C. A. 8). The National Banking Act affords a complete and [*702] adequate administrative remedy unfettered by judicial ascertainment as to the wisdom or necessity of the action of the Comp…
-
Erickson v. Richardson, 86 F.2d 963 (9th Cir. 1936)…Thomas (C.C.A.6) 86 F. (2d) 510, November 11, 1936. The court then cites and relies upon its earlier decision in Deweese v. Smith (C.C. A.) 106 F. 438, 441, 66 L.R.A. 971, affirmed by the Supreme Court in Smith v. Brown, 187 U.S. 637, 23 S.Ct. 845, 47 L.Ed. 344. The Supreme Court sustains the decision of the Eighth Circuit, in which the latter court held: “The liability of a shareholder of a national bank is contractual. It rests on his subscription for or his receipt and acceptance of his stock. By that…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U.S. 361 (U.S. 1893)
- Erie R.R. Co. v. Purdy, 185 U.S. 148 (U.S. 1902)
- Harrison v. Morton, 171 U.S. 38 (U.S. 1898)