ELIZA A. WALL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,

v.

OLD COLONY TRUST COMPANY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Broderick v. Rosner, 294 U.S. 629 (U.S. 1935)
  …, 18 N. Y. 199, 211-213. By the Laws of 1934, c. 494, further changes, of no importance here, have been made in this section. Casey v. Galli, 94 U. S. 673, 681; National Bank v. Case, 99 U. S. 628, 634-5; DeWeese v. Smith, 106 Fed. 438, 445, aff’d, 187 U. S. 637; Murray v. Sill, 7 F. (2d) 589; Crawford v. Gamble, 57 F. (2d) 15; B. V. Emery & Co. v. Wilkinson, 72 F. (2d) 10; see Studebaker v. Perry, 184 U. S. 258, 266; Rankin v. Barton, 199 U. S. 228, 232. Compare Bushnell v. Leland, 164 U. S. 684; Korbly v.…
• Miller v. Stock, 65 F.2d 773 (3d Cir. 1933)
  …t it. It is not to be questioned in the litigation that may ensue. He may make it at such time as he may deem proper, and upon such data as shall be satisfactory to him.” In Deweese v. Smith (C. C. A.) 106 F. 438, 445, 66 L. R. A. 971, affirmed in 187 U. S. 637, 23. S. Ct. 845, 47 L. Ed. 344, it is said: “But this question is not open to litigation in this case. Under the acts of congress and the decisions of the courts to which reference has been made the comptroller of the currency constitutes a quasi j…
• Schram v. Schwartz, 68 F.2d 699 (2d Cir. 1934)
  …Ed. 168; Germania National Bank v. Case, 99 U. S. 628, 634, 635, 25 L. Ed. 448; United States ex rel. Citizens’ Nat. Bank v. Knox, 102 U. S. 422, 426, 26 L. Ed. 216; Bushnell v. Leland, 164 U. S. 684, 17 S. Ct. 209, 41 L. Ed. 598; Deweese v. Smith, 187 U. S. 637, 23 S. Ct. 845, 47 L. Ed. 344, affirming without opinion 106 F. 438, 66 L. R. A. 971 (C. C. A. 8). The National Banking Act affords a complete and [*702] adequate administrative remedy unfettered by judicial ascertainment as to the wisdom or neces…

Authorities Cited

• Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U.S. 361 (U.S. 1893)