ROBERT T. MATHIS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Swartz v. Russell, 481 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …he issue of part performance which would remove the oral lease from the statute of frauds. Poinciana Properties, Ltd. v. Englander Triangle, Inc., 437 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), review denied, 447 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 1984); Moore v. Staalac, Inc., 166 So. 2d 814 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 171 So. 2d 391 (Fla.1964). Accordingly, the order under review is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to proceed in a manner consistent with this opinion.6 Reversed and remanded. . While co-personal repr…
• Daneisis Lopez v. Perez, 221 So. 3d 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
  …. 2d 1166, 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (holding, on appeal from order modifying shared parental responsibility, that appellate court must review the entire record in a [*1205] light most favorable to the prevailing party); Moore v. Staalac, Inc., No. 2, 166 So. 2d 814, 815 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964) (holding appellate court must consider the record in a light most favorable to appellee when reviewing disputed issues of fact that have been resolved by the trier of fact). . Lopez makes much of the fact that, at the hearin…
• Gulf-Atlantic Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Rigdon, 34 Fla. Supp. 166 (Lake Cty. Cir. Ct. 1970)
  …. 71; Miller v. Murray, Fla., 68 So. 2d 594. The statute of frauds is inapplicable when a contracting party has partially performed his share of the bargain. Crossman v. Fountainebleau Hotel Corp., 273 F. 2d 720; Moore v. Staalac, Inc., No. 2, Fla., 166 So. 2d 814, 3rd Dist. c. It clearly appears from the allegations of count 1 of the counterclaim, set out on pages 1-3 of this order, that (1) none of the oral agreements between defendant and the agents of plaintiff specifically requires said agreements not t…

Authorities Cited

• Bruce Hinson Gammage and Larry v. Gysin, 162 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)