CALUMET GRAIN AND ELEVATOR COMPANY
v.
CHICAGO
CALUMET GRAIN AND ELEVATOR COMPANY
CHICAGO
188 U.S. 431
Supreme Court of the United States (1903)
Caution
Also reported at: 47 L. Ed. 532 · 23 S. Ct. 477 · 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1288 · SCDB 1902-062
Cited by 96 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court.
This case relates to the construction of a dock in Calumet River, on or in front of land belonging to the appellant. The facts upon which that company principally bases its claims for relief are those upon which the plaintiffs relied in Cummings v. Chicago, just decided. Upon the authority of the decision in that case, the judgment in this case is
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (48 total)
-
Bancroft Inv. Corp. v. THE City OF Jacksonville, 157 Fla. 546 (Fla. 1946)…Ed. 373; Railway Company v. McShane, 89 U.S. 444, 22 L. Ed. 747; Wisconsin Central Railroad Co. v. Price County, 133 U.S. 496, 33 L. Ed. 687; Irwin v. Wright, 258 U.S. 219, 42 S. Ct. 293, 66 L. Ed. 573; U.S. v. Rickert, 188 U.S. 432, 23 S. Ct. 478, 47 L. Ed. 532; Copp v. State, 69 W. Va. 439, 71 S.E. 580, 35 L.R. A.N.S. 699; ABR Corporation v. City of Newark, 131 N.J.L. 147, 35 A. (2nd) 473, 133 N.J.L. 34, 42 A. (2nd) 296; Mint Realty Co. v. City of Philadelphia, 218 Pa. St. 104, 66 A. 1130; People v. Burke…
-
Seminole Tribe OF Florida v. State, 720 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…the federal government. 25 U.S.C. § 450a(b) (Supp.1997). Although at the turn of this century, the Supreme Court enunciated a “federal instrumentality” doctrine, as applied to Indian tribes, in United States v. Rickert, 188 U.S. 432, 23 S.Ct. 478, 47 L.Ed. 532 (1903), Indian tribes are no longer considered such. The decline of that theory is explained in Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones, 411 U.S. 145, 93 S.Ct. 1267, 36 L.Ed.2d 114 (1973) and cases cited therein. In Groundhog v. Keeler, 442 F. 2d 674 (10th…
-
Santa Rosa Band OF Indians v. Kings Cnty., 532 F.2d 655 (9th Cir. 1975)…t lands are a Federal instrumentality held to effect the Federal policy of Indian advancement and may not therefore be burdened or interfered with by the state, is a product of judicial decision. United States v. Rickert, 188 U.S. 432, 23 S.Ct. 478, 47 L.Ed. 532 (1903). Each of these judicially defined characteristics of Indian trust property remained implicit in subsequent congressional enactments dealing with trust property. The language used in § 465 must be read against this backdrop, which provides…
Previewing 3 of 48 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence