WILLIAM E. HALE, RECEIVER, ETC., PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES A. HILLIKER

U.S. | 1903-01-19
No. 433
188 U.S. 739 Supreme Court of the United States (1903) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Bernheimer v. Converse, 206 U.S. 516 (U.S. 1907)
  • Great W. Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Harris, 198 U.S. 561 (U.S. 1905)
  • King v. State of W. Va. & Spruce Coal & Lumber Co., 216 U.S. 92 (U.S. 1910)
    …171 U. S. 404, where the validity of the system [*94] created by the constitution and statute referred to was considered and maintained in a suit concerning this same tract. See also King v. Panther Lumber Co., 171 U. S. 437. Swann v. West Virginia, 188 U. S. 739. These provisions being in the interest of actual.settlement in the country, the Constitution also provides that all titles of the State to forfeited lands, &c., not redeemed or redeemable, shall be vested in any person, other than the one in defau…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw