W. H. BREWTON, DOVE C. FALLS, DREW CROFT, ARCHIE STORCH, AS THE PASCO COUNTY CANVASSING BOARD, PETITIONERS,
v.
RICHARD KELLY, RESPONDENT

Fla. 2d DCA | 1964-08-19
No. 5184
ALLEN, Acting C. J., and SHANNON, J., concur.
166 So. 2d 837 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1964) Caution
Cited by 10 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A Writ of Prohibition should be issued against the judge to prevent further proceedings in a case where the judge refused to disqualify himself.


Facts & Procedural History

A suggestion for a Writ of Prohibition was filed against a Circuit Court Judge who refused to disqualify himself in a case involving election candidat…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
ANDREWS, Judge.

ANDREWS, Judge.

This matter is before the court on Rule Nisi issued upon suggestion for Writ of Prohibition requiring the Honorable Richard Kelly as Judge of the Circuit Court in and for Pasco County to show cause why said Writ should not be issued prohibiting said Judge from proceeding further in that certain cause identified as Case No. 9072 pending in the Circuit Court of Pasco County wherein Richard E. Johnston is Plaintiff, A1 Vogel and W. N. Jackson as candidates for Constable, District No. 1, and W. H. Brewton, Dove C. Falls, Drew Croft and Archie Storch, as The Pasco. County Canvassing Board, are Defendants.

This case was consolidated for oral argument with the case of Brewton v. Kelly, Case No. 5183 Fla.App., 166 So.2d 834, in which our Opinion has been filed this date in this court. The facts and circumstances are the same, except this case involves the office of Constable rather than Sheriff. In Case No. 5183 we found the factual situation such as should prohibit the trial judge from proceeding further in the principal case except to disqualify himself. In this case, as in Case No. 5183, Judge Kelly refused to disqualify himself.

Accordingly, it follows that a Writ of Prohibition should be issued from this court prohibiting Judge Richard Kelly from exercising jurisdiction in or making any further orders or decrees in the suit of Johnston v. Vogel, identified as Pasto County Circuit Court Case No. 9072, except to disqualify himself.

It is so ordered.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and SHANNON, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Beta ETA House Corp. v. Gregory, 237 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 1970)
    …ed to liability insurance carriers under Rule 1.270(b) only to the same extent and on the same terms as to any other litigant.3 ERVIN, C. J., concurs. . 223 So. 2d 713 (Fla.1969). . 230 So. 2d 459, 500 (Fla.App. 1st 1970). . Vander Car v. Pitts, 166 So. 2d 837 (Fla.App.2d 1964) ; Bowen v. Manuel, 144 So. 2d 341, 343 (Fla.App.2d 1962) : “When the proper administration of justice makes it imperative, the trial courts of this state may, in their discretion, order the separate trial of the several issues in a…
  • …had not been released at the time their respective motions were denied. This argument overlooks the fact that a severance in civil cases has been held to be a matter of discretion in the trial court for many years. Vander Car v. Pitts, Fla.App.1964, 166 So. 2d 837; Bowen v. Manuel, Fla.App.1962, 144 So. 2d 341; and 32 Fla.Jur., Trial § 18. We have reviewed the record and the briefs in light of this contention and find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion or commit error in the denial of [*20] th…
  • Maris Distrib. Co. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 710 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
    …ssen the delay, expense and inconvenience to all concerned, and the courts have emphasized that separate trial should not be ordered unless such disposition is clearly necessary, and then only in the furtherance of justice.” See Vander Car v. Pitts, 166 So. 2d 837, 839 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964). It is improper to sever a counterclaim and affirmative defenses from the plaintiffs claim, when the facts underlying the claims of the respective parties are inextricably interwoven. See Plantation Village Ltd. v. Aycock, 61…

Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw