GIBBONS

v.

OGDEN

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Local NO. 438 Constr. & Gen. Laborers' Union, AFL-CIO v. Curry, 371 U.S. 542 (U.S. 1963)
  …eorgia courts had power to proceed with and determine this controversy. The issue ripe for review is not whether a Georgia court has erroneously decided a matter of federal' law in a case admittedly within its jurisdiction (compare Gibbons v. Ogden, 6 Wheat. 448) nor is it the question of whether federal or state law governs a case properly before the Georgia courts. Compare Local 174 v. Lucas Flour Co., 369 U. S. 95. What we do have here is a judgment of the Georgia court finally and erroneously asserting…
• Stoutenburgh v. Hennick, 129 U.S. 141 (U.S. 1889)
  …nation, among the several States, or with an Indian tribe, it is not an act over which the Congress of the United States had any exclusive power of regulation. • Commerce among the several States, as was early held by this court in Gibbons v. Ogden, 6 Wheat. 448, means commerce between citizens of the several States, and' had no reference to transaction's by a State, as such, with another State, in their corporate or public capacities. Indeed, it .would be of very little lvalue if that was the limitation or…
• Delaware v. Rellstab, 276 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1928)