JAMES H. GILBERT, SHERIFF, PETITIONER,

v.

AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY OF NEW YORK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Nat'l Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. United States, 183 F.2d 405 (2d Cir. 1950)
  …e in ex-tremis doctrine apply. The Favorita, 18 Wall. 598, 603, 85 U.S. 598, 603, 21 L.Ed. 856; Publicover v. Alcoa S. S. Co., 2 Cir., 168 F. 2d 672; The Queen Elizabeth, 2 Cir., 122 F. 406, certiorari denied sub nom. Holmes v. The Queen Elizabeth, 190 U.S. 560, 23 S.Ct. 855, 47 L.Ed. 1184. Here-the situation which obtained at the moment the Nashbulk starboarded had long been foreseeable ■ as a possibility and, • as already observed, it must be assumed that the Nash-bulk’s master had ample opportunity for…
• Neff Instrument Corp. v. Cohu Elecs., Inc., 269 F.2d 668 (9th Cir. 1959)
  …ufficient to create an infringement. Becton Dickinson & Co. v. R. P. Scherer Corp., 6 Cir., 1954, 211 F. 2d 835, 842; Carter Crume Co. v. American Sales Book Co., C.C.W.D.N.Y. 1903, 124 F. 903, certiorari denied American Sales Book Co. v. Bullivant, 190 U.S. 560, 23 S.Ct. 855, 47 L.Ed. 1184. And even the threat to use patented subject matter may give a right to a cause of action. See Fehr v. Activated Sludge, Inc., 7 Cir., 1936, 84 F. 2d 948, 951. If this be so, how can we view ap-pellees’ sales convention…
• United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Whittaker, 8 F.2d 455 (9th Cir. 1925)
  …subsequent action or be conclusive as to the issues determined “where on remand the cause is dismissed or the plaintiff suffers a nonsuit.” 34 C. J. 800; Gilbert v. American Surety Co., 121 F. 499, 57 C. C. A. 619, 61 L. R. A. 253, certiorari denied 190 U. S. 560, 23 S. Ct. 855, 47 L. Ed. 1184; Jones v. Knights of Honor, 236 Ill. 113, 86 N. E. 191; Spring Valley Coal Co. v. Patting, 210 Ill. 342, 71 N. C. 371. “As a general rule, the judgment of an appellate court, reversing a judgment, decree, or order of a…