HUNTINGTON

v.

THE CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (38 total)

• Vesper Price O'Brien v. Howell, 92 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 1957)
  …ebts, * * * except such as * * * (2) are liabilities for * * * willful and malicious injuries to the person or property of another, * * We do not agree. Since the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Tinker v. Colwell, 1903, 193 U.S. 473, 24 S.Ct. 505, 509, 48 L.Ed. 754, it is settled that “willful and malicious injuries”, within the meaning of the Act, are not confined to those accompanied by particular and personal malice toward the person injured and without which an action to recover for such…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Chapman v. Houston Welf. Rights Org., 441 U.S. 600 (U.S. 1979)
  …83, and those decisions did not raise the issue of the meaning of the “and laws” term in the statute. Some of the early eases were dismissed for failure to allege a deprivation under “color of law.” See, e. g., Huntington v. City [*659] of New York, 193 U. S. 441 (1904); Barney v. City of New York, 193 U. S. 430 (1904). The concept of state action relied upon in these opinions was rejected in Home Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Los Angeles, 227 U. S. 278 (1913). See also Devine v. Los Angeles, 202 U. S. 313 (1906);…
• Indus. Elecs. Corp. v. Cline, 330 F.2d 480 (3d Cir. 1964)
  …uired to adequately establish that there is at least a reasonable probability of ultimate success upon the question of jurisdiction when the action is tried on the merits. Huntington v. City of New York, 118 F. 683, 685 (Cir.Ct. S.D.N.Y.1902), affd. 193 U.S. 441, 24 S.Ct. 505, 48 L.Ed. 741 (1904); Farson v. City of Chicago, 138 F. 184 (Cir.Ct.N.D.Ill.1905); Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. City of Mobile, 179 F. 955, 960 (Cir.Ct.S.D.Ala.1909). If the plaintiff fails to meet this requirement, denial of injunc…