M. J. COVENTRY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
J. W. DAVIS ET AL.
M. J. COVENTRY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
J. W. DAVIS ET AL.
193 U.S. 668
Supreme Court of the United States (1904)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on authority of New Orleans Waterworks Company v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180. Case reported in state court, 65 Kansas, 557.
Mr. Eugene F. Ware for the plaintiffs in error.' Mr. J. D. McCleverty and Mr. W. P. Dillard for defendants in error.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Youngs Rubber Corp., Inc. v. C. I. LEE &. Co., Inc., 45 F.2d 103 (2d Cir. 1930)…purchasers for illegal uses, as plaintiff itself must know. Does this fact preclude it from maintaining its suit because of section 21 or general equitable principles? In Fuller v. Berger, 120 F. 274, 65 L. R. A. 381 (C. C. A. 7), certiorari denied 193 U. S. 668, 24 S. Ct. 852, 48 L. Ed. 839, the complainant sought to enjoin infringement of a patent on a bogus coin detector for coin-operated vending machines. The only use to which complainant put the detector was to guard gambling machines made by it. Defen…
-
Application of William C. Anthony, 414 F.2d 1383 (C.C.P.A. 1969)…n standard insulin was needed. Yet that danger, if real, hut shows the need for regulated sale of it and does not negative its utility * * *. [Emphasis supplied.] Or, as the court noted in Fuller v. Berger, 120 F. 274 (7th Cir., 1903), cert. denied 193 U.S. 668, 24 S.Ct. 852, 48 L.Ed. 839: With regard to the defense of no utility (available equally at law and in equity), we hold that the true inquiry is, Was the government improvident in making the grant? Does the opposing evidence, the grant itself being…
Authorities Cited
- Sayward v. Denny, 158 U.S. 180 (U.S. 1895)
- New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U.S. 336 (U.S. 1902)