SELDEN
v.
MONTAGUE

U.S. | 1904-04-25
No. 190
194 U.S. 153 Supreme Court of the United States (1904) Caution
Also reported at: 48 L. Ed. 915 · 24 S. Ct. 613 · 1904 U.S. LEXIS 650 · SCDB 1903-079
Cited by 31 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Brewer

Mr. Justice Brewer delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit in equity brought to obtain by injunction the same relief as was sought in the preceding case. The facts and conditions are substantially similar, and for the reasons there given the appeal will be dismissed without costs to either party.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Pacelli, 491 F.2d 1108 (2d Cir. 1974)
    …vileges whereas § 245 is limited to specifically enumerated substantive offenses, including those committed by a single person. Compare Chase v. United States, 256 U.S. 1, 41 S.Ct. 417, 65 L.Ed. 801 (1921) with Gibson v. United States, 194 U.S. 182, 24 S.Ct. 613, 48 L.Ed. 926 (1964). In support of his amendment by implication theory, appellant relies upon Senate Report 721 issued by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary to accompany H.R. 2516, the bill which was ultimately turned into § 245. See U.S.Code C…
  • Selected Prods. Corp. v. Humphreys, 86 F.2d 821 (7th Cir. 1936)
    …L.Ed. 860; Wingert v. Hagerstown First Nat. Bank, 223 U.S. 670, 32 S.Ct. 391, 56 L.Ed. 605; U. S. v. Evans, 213 U.S. 297, 29 S.Ct. 507, 53 L.Ed. 803; Security Mut. L. Ins. Co. v. Prewitt, 200 U.S. 446, 26 S.Ct. 314, 50 L.Ed. 545; Selden v. Montague, 194 U.S. 153, 24 S.Ct. 613, 48 L.Ed. 915; Jones v. Montague, 194 U.S. 147, 24 S.Ct. 611, 48 L.Ed. 913; Dunn v. State, 163 Ind. 317, 71 N.E. 890. Such a condition may arise by the act of the appellant or plaintiff in error himself. Lewis Pub. Co. v. Wyman, 228 U.…
  • Brill v. Gen. Indus. Enters., 234 F.2d 465 (3d Cir. 1956)
    …trained has been performed, the appellate courts will deny review on the ground of mootness. Mills v. Green, 1895, 159 U.S. 651, 16 S.Ct. 132, 40 L.Ed. 293; Jones v. Montague, 1904, 194 U.S. 147, 24 S.Ct. 611, 48 L.Ed. 913; Selden v. Montague, 1904, 194 U.S. 153, 24 S.Ct. 613, 48 L.Ed. 915; Richardson v. McChesney, 1910, 218 U.S. 487, 31 S.Ct. 43, 54 L.Ed. 1121; Wingert v. First National Bank of Hagerstown, 1912, 223 U.S. 670, 32 S.Ct. 391, 56 L.Ed. 605; Shaw v. Lane, 1917, 47 App.D.C. 170, 173, appeal dism…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw