LOWE
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1904-04-25
No. 212
■ Mr. Justice Brewer took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
194 U.S. 193 Supreme Court of the United States (1904) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 48 L. Ed. 931 · 24 S. Ct. 617 · 1904 U.S. LEXIS 651 · SCDB 1903-080
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Day

Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court.

This case involves the same question, upon identical facts, as to the pay of a retired rear admiral, just disposed of in the case of Gibson v. United States, ante.

For the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the Court of Claims, dismissing the petition of the appellant, is

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Brewer took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Bishop v. Chillingworth, 114 Fla. 286 (Fla. 1934)
    …ois, 7 Cranch (U. S.) *576, 3 L. Ed. 444; Ex Parte Bradstreet, 7 Peters (U. S.) 634, 8 L. Ed. 810; New York Fire & Life. Ins. Co. v. Wilson’s Heirs, [*293] 8 Peters (U. S.) 291, 8 L. Ed. 949; In re United States, 194 U. S. 194, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 629, 48 L. Ed. 931; Ex Parte Virginia, 100 U. S. 313, 25 L. Ed. 667. In Rest v. State, 77 Fla. 225, 81 Sou. Rep. 523, this court issued an order in the nature of a procedendo to require a criminal court of record to adjudge a convicted prisoner insolvent in order tha…
  • Wilson v. United States, 77 F.2d 236 (8th Cir. 1935)
    …U. S. 354, 357, 46 S. Ct. 513, 514, 70 L. Ed. 986; Hawaii v. Mankichi, 190 U. S. 197, 212, 23 S. Ct. 787, 47 L. Ed. 1016; United States v. Kirby, 7 Wall. 482, 486, 19 L. Ed. 278. And see In re United States, Petitioner, 194 U. S. 194, 24 S. Ct. 629, 48 L. Ed. 931, and Glickstein v. United States, 222 U. S. 139, 143, 32 S. Ct. 71, 56 L. Ed. 128. Reduced to its lowest terms, the question with which we are confronted is whether, taken according to their ordinary meaning, the words of the statute are sufficient…
  • In re Babcock, 26 F.2d 153 (7th Cir. 1928)
    …ate a ease, and to proceed to try and adjudicate the same. And see In. re Pennsylvania Co., 137 U. S. 451, 452 [11 S. Ct. 141, 34 L. Ed. 738]; Virginia v. Rives, 100 U. S. 313 [25 L. Ed. 667]; United States, Petitioner, 194 U. S. 194 [24 S. Ct. 629, 48 L. Ed. 931]; Barber Asphalt Co. v. Morris [C. C. A.] 132 F. 945 [67 L. R. A. 761]. “Inasmuch as the order of the Circuit Court, staying the proceeding until after final judgment in the state court might prevent the Adjudication of the questions involved, and…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw