HAMBURG-AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
MARY W. LENNAN, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF JOHN M. LENNAN, DECEASED

U.S. | 1904-04-18
No. 622
194 U.S. 629 Supreme Court of the United States (1904) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court

In error to the-Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted April 11, 1904. Decided April 18, 1904. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Staten Island Railway Company v. Lambert, 131 U. S. Appx. ccxi; Weatherby v. Bowie, 131 U. S. Appx. ccxv; Murdock v. Memphis, 20 Wall. 590; Egan v. Hart, 165 U. S. 188, 191; Hannibal and St. Joseph Railway Company v. Packet Company, 125 U. S. 260, 272; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; New Orleans Waterworks Company v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336. And see Lennan v. Hamburg-American Steamship Company, 73 App. Div. (N. Y.) 357; The Alene, 116 Fed. Rep. 57. Mr. William Lindsay and Mr. J, Culbert Palmer in support of motions. Mr. Everett P. Wheeler opposing.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hamburg Am. S.S. Co. v. Grube, 196 U.S. 407 (U.S. 1905)
    …ld be for the defendant. The charge of the court is not before us, nor was any exception [*414] taken to any part of it, and the verdict and judgment must be held to have been rendered on the facts according to law. Hamburg-Am. S. S. Co. v. Lennan, 194 U. S. 629. This being the situation we hesitate to retain jurisdiction. Nevertheless, as clause 17 of section 8 of Article I of the Constitution 1 may be regarded as having been properly invoked by the. second proposition, we feel justified in declining to s…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw