WILLIAM M. MEFFERT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
E. B. PACKER ET AL., ETC.

U.S. | 1904-11-14
No. 64
195 U.S. 625 Supreme Court of the United States (1904) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs. Hawker v. New York, 170 U. S. 189; Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114; Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505; Gray v. Connecticut, 159 U. S. 574;

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U.S. 61 (U.S. 1911)
  • Sony Corp. of Am. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (U.S. 1984)
    …sting copyright law, motion pictures and other audiovisual works have been accorded full copyright protection since at least 1912, see Act of Aug. 24, 1912, 37 Stat. 488, and perhaps before, see Edison v. Lubin, 122 F. 240 (CA3 1903), appeal dism’d, 195 U. S. 625 (1904). Congress continued this protection in the 1976 Act. Unlike the sound recording rights created by the 1971 Amendment, the reproduction rights associated with motion pictures under § 106(1) are not limited to reproduction for public distribu…
  • Webb v. United States, 249 U.S. 96 (U.S. 1919)

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw