LOUIS A. DARNAL, PETITIONER,

v.

THE UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Baumgartner v. Joughin, 105 Fla. 335 (Fla. 1932)
  …of judgment of those jurors who are likely to be called upon to become triers of fact, and who, outside of their own conscience, are answerable to no one for errors in their decisions. Thus in McCaully v. U. S., 25 App. D. C. 404 (certiorari denied 198 U. S. 586, 49 L. Ed. 1174, 25 Sup. Ct. 803), it was held that a prima facie case of guilt was made out in support of a charge of contempt of court by attempting to corruptly influence a juryman in a pending case, when it was shown that two days before the tri…
• Ill. Cent. R.R. Co. v. Sheegog, 215 U.S. 308 (U.S. 1909)
• Fritzlen v. Boatmen's Bank, 212 U.S. 364 (U.S. 1909)
  …cuit .Court. The judgment dismissing the replevin suit for want of jurisdiction was reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings. 135 Fed. Rep. 650. A petition praying a writ of certiorari to review this judgment was by this court denied. 198 U. S. 586. The case pending on error in the Supreme Court of Kansas was thereafter decided. That court, without questioning the order remanding the cause made by Pollock, J., as controlling in the condition of the pleadings at the time that order was made, h…