DIMOND

v.

SHINE

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Hamilton Ridge Lumber Sales Corp. v. Wilson, 25 F.2d 592 (4th Cir. 1928)
  …cts Co., 2 F.(2d) 203, has exhaustively considered this question, and [*596] reviewed practically all of the authorities cited by attorneys in this ease, and reached the conclusion above stated. The ease of Union Trust Co. v. Wilson, 198 U. S. 530, 25 S. Ct. 766, 49 L. Ed. 1154, relied upon by attorneys for appellant, is easily distinguished from the present ease. In that case the possession of the pledgee was clear and plain, and the dominion and control of pledgor was completely excluded, which is not tru…
• Bradley v. ST. Louis Terminal Warehouse Co., 189 F.2d 818 (8th Cir. 1951)
  …he warehouseman as bailee who for hire takes and maintains open, visible and exclusive possession of the warehouse goods. The leading case in the Federal courts sustaining the validity of such transactions is Union Trust Co. v. Wilson, 198 U.S. 530, 25 S.Ct. 766, 49 L.Ed. 1154, followed in Heffron v. Bank of America, 9 Cir., 113 F. 2d 239, annotated in 133 A.L.R. at p. 209, where the decisions of many jurisdictions are collected. The court’s finding that the warehouse company was at all times material to t…
• In re Spanish-American Cork Prods. Co. W. Nat. Bank of Baltimore v. Chapman (two cases), 2 F.2d 203 (4th Cir. 1924)
  …nal Bank v. Pennsylvania Trust Co., 124 F. 968, 60 C. C. A. 100; Van Brunt v. Pike, 4 Gill (Md.) 270, 45 Am. Dec. 126; Dale v. Pattison, 234 U. S. 399, 34 S. Ct. 785, 58 L. Ed. 1370, 52 L. R. A. (N. S.) 754; Union Trust Co. v. Wilson, 198 U. S. 530, 25 S. Ct. 766, 49 L. Ed. 1154; Philadelphia Warehouse Co. v. Winchester (C. C.) 156 F. 600; Love v. Export Storage Co., 143 F. 1, 74 C. C. A. 155; Fidelity Ins. & S. D. Co. v. Roanoke Iron Co. (C. C.) 81 F. 439; American Can Co. v. Erie Preserving Co. (C. C.) 171…

  ← 1 / 2 →