EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF LEONIDAS M. LAWSON ET AL.

U.S. | 1905-10-16
199 U.S. 599 Supreme Court of the United States (1905) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …tion. The validity of the bankruptcy act was conceded, and no right specially set up or claimed .under it was denied.” That case has frequently been cited approvingly since. Warder v. Loomis, 197 U. S. 619; Watkins v. American Nat’l Bank of Denver, 199 U. S. 599; Mobile Transportation Co. v. Mobile, 199 U. S. 604; Montana Catholic Missions v. Missoula County, 200 U. S. 118, 126; Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill and Sullivan Mining Co., 200 U. S. 613; Russell v. Russell, 200 U. S.…
  • Coos Bay Lumber Co. v. Collier, 104 F.2d 722 (9th Cir. 1939)
    …the judgment in the action against him does not bar or adjudicate his affirmative cause of action upon them, and he is free to subsequently maintain it. * * * ” See also: Watkins v. American Nat. Bank, 8 Cir., 134 F. 36, 40, writ of error dismissed 199 U.S. 599, 26 S.Ct. 746, 50 L.Ed. 327; Pierce v. National Bank of Commerce, 8 Cir., 268 F. 487, 496; Independent Harvester Co. v. Tinsman, 7 Cir., 253 F. 935, 936; Young v. Baker, Fentress & Co., 7 Cir., 74 F. 2d 422, 423; 83 A.L.R. 642, annotation. Compare:…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw