THE MOBILE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE CITY OF MOBILE ET AL.
THE MOBILE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, APPELLANT,
THE CITY OF MOBILE ET AL.
199 U.S. 604
Supreme Court of the United States (1905)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 826, c. 517, §6; Colorado Central Consolidated Mining Company v. Turck, 150 U. S. 138; Rouse v. Letcher, 156 U. S. 47; Carey v. Houston and Texas Central Railway Company, 161 U. S. 115; Ex parte Jones, 164 U. S. 691; Gableman v. Peoria Railway Company, 179 U. S. 335, 339; Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U. S. 405; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Company, 191 U. S. 526; Mobile Transportation Company v. Mobile, 187 U. S. 482; S. C., 195 U. S. 631.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lovell in Bankruptcy of Knight v. Newman & SON, 227 U.S. 412 (U.S. 1913)…d, and no right specially set up or claimed .under it was denied.” That case has frequently been cited approvingly since. Warder v. Loomis, 197 U. S. 619; Watkins v. American Nat’l Bank of Denver, 199 U. S. 599; Mobile Transportation Co. v. Mobile, 199 U. S. 604; Montana Catholic Missions v. Missoula County, 200 U. S. 118, 126; Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill and Sullivan Mining Co., 200 U. S. 613; Russell v. Russell, 200 U. S. 613; Bush v. Elliott, supra; Warder v. Cotton and Gr…
Authorities Cited
- Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U.S. 526 (U.S. 1903)
- Colo. Cent. Consol. Mining Co. v. Turck, 150 U.S. 138 (U.S. 1893)
- Gableman v. Peoria, 179 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1900)
- Rouse v. Letcher, 156 U.S. 47 (U.S. 1895)
- Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U.S. 405 (U.S. 1903)
- Carey v. Houston & Tex. Cent. Ry. Co., 161 U.S. 115 (U.S. 1896)
- Ex parte Jones, 164 U.S. 691 (U.S. 1897)