OSWALD, ADMINISTRATOR, VERSUS THE STATE OF NEW-YORK

U.S. | 1792-08-01
2 Dall. 402 Supreme Court of the United States (1792) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 1 L. Ed. 433 · SCDB 1792-002 · 1792 U.S. LEXIS 589
Cited by 9 cases

Opinion of the Court

SUMMONS. Ingerfoll moved for a rule on the marffiall of the diftridl of; New-Torb, to return the writ in this caufe; and, after advifement, the Court granted the rule in the following terms:

Ordered, That. the. marffiall of the New-Torb diUriel return the writ to him directed in this caufe, before the adjournment of this court, if a copy of this rule ffiall be feafonably ferved upon him, or his deputy, or, otherwife, on the firft day of the next term. And that in cafe of a default, he do ffiew caufe therefor, by affidavit taken before one of the judges, of the United States.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • In re Ayers, 123 U.S. 443 (U.S. 1887)
    …n the case of The Governor of Georgia v. Madrazo, 1 Pet. 110, 123, 124. After quoting the paragraphs from the opinion in the case of Osborn v. Bank of the United States, above extracted, the Chief Justice mentioned the case of Georgia v. Brailsford, 2 Dall. 402, where the action was not in the name of the State, but was brought by the Governor in its behalf, and added: "If, therefore, the State was properly considered as a party in that case, it may be considered as a party in this." He further said: "The…
  • State of Wis. v. Pelican Ins. Co., 127 U.S. 265 (U.S. 1888)
    …ut expressing any opinion upon the merits of the case,, granted a temporary injunction to stay the money in the hands of the marshal of the Circuit Court, until the title to the bond as between the State of Georgia and the defendants could be tried. 2 Dall. 402. At February term, 1798, upon a motion to dissolve that injunction, this court held that if the State of Georgia had the title in the debt (upon which no opinion was then expressed) she had an.adequate remedy at law,'by action upon the bond; but, i…
  • California v. S. Pac. Co., 157 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1895)
    …st a citizen of another State, but not against one of its own, and it has never been held that the court could take original jurisdiction of controversies between a State-and citizens of another State and its own citizens. In Georgia v. Brailsford, 2 Dall. 402, the State of Georgia filed a bill in equity in this court against Brailsford and others, copartners, who were aliens, and Spalding, a citizen [*259] of Georgia, against whom they had obtained judgment, to restrain payment thereof to Brailsford & Co…

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw