STATE, EX REL. MANLEY LAWSON, F. W. ROQUEMORE, ET AL.,
v.
J. M. LEE, AS COMPTROLLER

Fla. | 1935-11-09
Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and. Davis, J. J., concur.
121 Fla. 550 Florida Supreme Court (1935) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 164 So. 192
Cited by 9 cases

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to that of State, ex rel. Patterson, v. Lee, as Comptroller, opinion filed this *551day and peremptory writ is awarded upon authority of the opinion and judgment in that case.

So ordered.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and. Davis, J. J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Kaufman, 430 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 1983)
    …islature after it ceases to be a duly constituted legislature, but apparently valid on the face of the journals, can be attacked by the use of parol evidence to show when the action was actually taken. State ex rel. Landis v. Thompson, 121 Fla. 561, 164 So. 192 (1935). Kaufman’s claim in the trial court fits within none of these exceptions. Because the legislature was in regular session, the Thompson exception is not applicable. Likewise, Kaufman has made no, let alone sufficient, allegations of fraud. Ka…
  • State v. Davis, 123 Fla. 41 (Fla. 1936)
    …esentad to the Governor” until on or after the calendar day of June 1, 1935. A motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus has been heretofore overruled (but without opinion) on the authority of State, ex rel. Landis v. Thompson, 121 Fla. 561, 164 Sou. Rep. 192, decided November 14, 1935. By a return filed by the respondent ministerial officers of the Legislature the fact is admitted that the regular 1935 session of the Florida Legislature did not in fact adjourn sine die on the calendar day of May 31, 193…
    1 / 5
  • Makos v. Prince, 64 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 1953)
    …oticed” them to be. However that may be, as to those matters of which the court may take judicial notice because they are matters of common knowledge, as distinguished from certain official records cf. State ex rel. Landis v. Thompson, 121 Fla. 561, 164 So. 192; and Schriver v. Tucker, Fla., 42 So. 2d 707, the rule is that the fact that a matter is judicially noticed means merely that it is taken as true without the necessity of .offering evidence by the party who should ordinarily have done so. This is be…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw