BROWDER

v.

M'ARTHUR

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Lovett v. State, 29 Fla. 384 (Fla. 1892)
• The Merchs'. Nat'l Bank of Jacksonville v. Isadore Grunthal, 39 Fla. 388 (Fla. 1897)
  …urt below in said causes, this court has no further jurisdiction to grant a rehearing or other relief therein. Grogan & Lent vs. Ruckle, 1 Cal. 193; In re Jessup, 81 Cal. 408, text 467, 21 Pac. Rep. 976, 22 Pac. Rep. 742, 1028; Browder vs. McArthur, 7 Wheat. 58; Atkinson vs. Richardson, 14 Wis. 157; Sullivan vs. Speights, 14 So. Ca. 358; Caldwell vs. Bruggerman, 8 Minn. 286; Delaplaine vs. Bergen, 7 Hill, 591; Martin vs. Wilson, 1 N. Y. 240; Legg vs. Overbagh, 4 Wend. 188, S. C. 21 Am. Dec. 115. Horne vs.…
• Ex parte Sibbald v. The United States, 12 Pet. 488 (U.S. 1838)
  …7; 1 H. & M. 557; 3 Menif. 228. After a mandate, no rehearing will be granted. It is never done in the House of Lords; 3 Dow. P. C. 157: and on a subsequent app.eal, nothing is brought up, but the proceeding subsequent to the mandate. 5 Cranch, 316; 7 Wheat. 58, 59; 10 Wheat. 443. If the special mandate directed by the 24th section, is not obeyed [*493] or executed, then the general power given to “ all the courts of the United States to issue any writs which are, necessary for thg exercise of their respe…