THE SANTA MARIA. THE SPANISH CONSUL, LIBELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A Spanish consul libeled cargo of sugar seized in Baltimore, claiming it was part of the cargo of the Spanish ship Santa Maria captured by an illegally armed American vessel in 1817. The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's judgment in favor of the libellant, finding that four credible witnesses—three who were present at the capture and one with direct knowledge of the cargo—provided uniform and particular testimony establishing that the sugar had been taken from the Santa Maria and brought to Baltimore, and no evidence contradicted their account.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Mr. Justice Living&tqn delivered the opinion of the Court, and after stating the case, proceeded as follows ; '
In a casé of%ó palpable a fitting out and arming in an American port, and proceeding thence directly on a cruize, (whether with or without a commission, is in this case immaterial,) the counsel for the claimant and libellant was right in not attempting to justify the capture. He has therefore confined his endeavours to show the insufficiency of the evidence to establish any title in the libellant, or in those whom he represents, to the merchandize in question.
The allegation of the libel is, that the property was part of the cargo of the Spa’nish ship Santa Maria, which was captured by the Patriota in the year 1817. The appellant says, there is no adequate proof of this fact. Without laying any stress on the register of this 'ship, which has been sent from the H avana, and to which the appellant has objected, there are four witnesses, and they are the only witnesses in the cause, whose relation is so uniform and particular as to leave no room to entertain doubt on any part of this transaction*
Three of thenvwere.on board of the Patriota, at the time of her sailing on her illegal cruise. They establish, not only the unlawful armament of this vessel in the port of Baltimore,, but the capture of the Santa Maria, and that the sugars libelled are the identical sugars which were taken out of her, and put on board of the schooner Harriet, in which they were brought to Baltimore. The other witness, Causter, although not present at the capture, testifies, in thé most positive terms, and of his own knowledge, that the sugars libelled were part of the cargo of the Santa Maria. He speaks so much in detail on the subject, and. his means of information were so ample, that it is impossible he should be mistaken. Under these circumstances, and w'hen not a single witness has been examined to throw any doubt on the' subject, the Court perceives no reason for disturbing the sentence, of the Circuit Court, which is affirmed with costs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The S.S. Appam, 243 U.S. 124 (U.S. 1917)
Authorities Cited
- The Divina Pastora.-The Spanish Consul, 4 Wheat. 52 (U.S. 1819)
- The Bello Corrunes. The Spanish Consul, 6 Wheat. 152 (U.S. 1821)
- The Estrella.-Hernandez, 4 Wheat. 298 (U.S. 1819)
- THE Brig Alerta v. Blas Moran, 9 Cranch 359 (U.S. 1815)
- The Nueva Anna & Liebre. The Spanish Consul, 6 Wheat. 193 (U.S. 1821)
- La Conception. The Spanish Consul, 6 Wheat. 235 (U.S. 1821)