EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF THE CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY, PETITIONER

U.S. | 1906-01-02
200 U.S. 613 Supreme Court of the United States (1906) Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hicks v. The Quaker Oats Co., 662 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir. 1981)
    …6) and cases cited therein; id. at ¶ 0.443 [5] at 3920-22; Scott, Collateral Estoppel by Judgment, 56 Harv.L.Rev. 1, 15 (1942). The only federal case squarely opposed to this rule is Russell v. Russell, 134 F. 840 (3d Cir. 1905), appeal dismissed, 200 U.S. 613, 26 S.Ct. 755, 50 L.Ed. 620 (1906). But cf. Markoff v. New York Life Insurance Co., 369 F.Supp. 308 (D.Nev.1973), aff’d 530 F. 2d 841 (9th Cir. 1976) (Nevada diversity case applying California law). . The major case relied on by the Restatement i…
  • …American Nat’l Bank of Denver, 199 U. S. 599; Mobile Transportation Co. v. Mobile, 199 U. S. 604; Montana Catholic Missions v. Missoula County, 200 U. S. 118, 126; Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill and Sullivan Mining Co., 200 U. S. 613; Russell v. Russell, 200 U. S. 613; Bush v. Elliott, supra; Warder v. Cotton and Grant, 207 U. S. 582; Shulthis v. McDougal, supra. The trustee, for his recovery upon the bond, did not rely upon any right specially conferred upon him under the Fede…
    1 / 2
  • …ed of the form of this decree, especially because of the insertion of the words “if this court shall so authorize,” and moved' in this court for leave to file a petition for mandamus requiring the ' district judge to modify it, but leave was denied. 200 U. S. 613. The trustee next made a similar application to the Circuit Court of Appeals, whereupon that court granted it and issued a peremptory writ requiring modifications to be made. 77 C. C. A. 408; 146 Fed. Rep. 742. The petitioners and plaintiffs in err…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw