ANNA SIEGEL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.; HEDEWIG KRIETE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.; DAVID W. O'NEIL ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. THE NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL; AND FRANZISKA SCHALZ, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.
ANNA SIEGEL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
THE NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.; HEDEWIG KRIETE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.; DAVID W. O'NEIL ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, V. THE NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL; AND FRANZISKA SCHALZ, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.
200 U.S. 615
Supreme Court of the United States (1906)
Per_curiam
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Per Curiam.
Judgments reversed with costs, and cases remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinions of this court in Muhlker v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company, 197 U. S. 544; Birrell v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company, 198 U. S. 390; Kierns v. New York and Harlem Railroad Company, 198 U. S. 390.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Muhlker v. N.Y. & Harlem R.R. Co., 197 U.S. 544 (U.S. 1905)
- Birrell v. N.Y. & Harlem R.R. Co., 198 U.S. 390 (U.S. 1905)