EX PARTE AUTOMATIC SWITCH COMPANY OF BALTIMORE CITY, PETITIONER

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• Hurn v. Oursler, 289 U.S. 238 (U.S. 1933)
  …. 576, 586-587; Greene v. Louisville & Interurban R. Co., 244 U.S. 499, 508; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Greene, 244 U.S. 522, 527; Davis v. Wallace, 257 U.S. 478, 482; Sterling v. Constantin, 287 U.S. 378, 393-394. Leschen Rope Co. v. Broderick Co., 201 U.S. 166, is said to establish á different doctrine. In that casé the plaintiff alleged that it owned a duly registered trademark which had been infringed by defendant. Upon demurrer the bill was dismissed on the ground that it disclosed that the trademark w…
• Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp., 305 U.S. 315 (U.S. 1938)
  …sues of jurisdiction in trade-mark law. Cf. Hurn v. Oursler, 289 U. S. 238, 240. Hurn v. Oursler, 289 U. S. 238. Hurn v. Oursler, 289 U. S. 238, 248. Two cases cited in the Oursler opinion deal with trade-marks: Leschen Rope Co. v. Broderick Co., 201 U. S. 166, and Elgin Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Co., 179 U. S. 665. They are there treated as out of line with the cases holding that facts supporting substantial federal and non-federal questions give jurisdiction to federal courts. Both state categorically…
• Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co., 220 U.S. 446 (U.S. 1911)
  …second contention of the Paint Company is that the Asphalt Company has been guilty of unfair trade and [*456] competition. The latter company urges that we are without jurisdiction to consider the contention and cites Leschen Rope Co. v. Broderick, 201 U. S. 166, in which a claim to a trade-mark for a distinctively colored streak applied to or woven in a wire rope was declared invalid. The bill, in addition to the infringement of the trade-mark, alleged unfair competition. The defendant in the case demurred…