MCHARG, RECEIVER, ET AL.,
v.
STAAKE

U.S. | 1906-04-30
No. 214
Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Peckham dissented',in both cases.
202 U.S. 150 Supreme Court of the United States (1906) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 50 L. Ed. 971 · 26 S. Ct. 584 · SCDB 1905-106 · 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1525
Cited by 49 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

As the facts in this case are practically the same as those set forth in the preceding and the legal principles are identical, this is also

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Peckham dissented',in both cases.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

  • Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 (U.S. 1965)
    …the defendants additional peremptory challenges and permit them to be exercised separately or jointly.” The Government’s right to stand aside was deemed to survive early statutes giving the Government peremptory challenges. Sawyer v. United States, 202 U. S. 150. See Waterford & Whitehall Turnpike Co. v. People, 9 Barb. 161 (Sup. Ct. N. Y. 1850); People v. McQuade, 110 N. Y. 284, 293, 18 N. E. 156, 158 (1888); State v. Humphreys, 1 Tenn. 306 (1808); Brown v. State, 62 N. J. L. 666, 678-688, 42 A. 811, 814-…
  • Caminetti v. United States, 242 U.S. 470 (U.S. 1917)
    …e privilege of the trial court to call the attention of the jury in such manner as it did to this omission of the accused when he took the stand in his own behalf. See in this connection Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S. 591, 597; Sawyer v. United States, 202 U. S. 150, 165; Powers v. United States, 223 U. S. 303, 314. It is urged as a further ground of reversal of the judgments below that the trial court did not instruct the jury that the testimony of the two girls was that of accomplices, and to be received wit…
  • Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co., Inc. v. Fox, 264 U.S. 426 (U.S. 1924)
    …nd circuit courts; but required that the jurisdiction be exercised in a plenary suit. Smith v. Mason, 14 Wall. 419; Marshall v. Knox, 16 Wall. 551; Lathrop v. Drake, 91 U. S. 516. First National Bank v. Staake, 202 U. S. 141, 148; McHarg v. Staake, 202 U. S. 150. Compare In re Hammond, 98 Fed. 845. The void lien is not preserved for the estate unless the trustee requests that it be done. See Goodnough Mercantile & Stock Co. v. Galloway, 171 Fed. 940; In re Walsh Bros., 195 Fed. 576; In re Prentice, 267 Fed…

Previewing 3 of 36 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw