THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, APPELLANT,

v.

THE LAKE SHORE AND MICHIGAN SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• All States Freight, Inc. v. New York, 379 U.S. 343 (U.S. 1964)
  …Thurber v. New York Central & H. R. Co., 3 I. C. C. 473 (1890); see National Hay Assn. v. Lake Shore & M. S. R. Co., 9 I. C. C. 264 (1902). Interstate Commerce Commission v. Lake Shore & M. S. R. Co., 134 F. 942, aff’d by an equally divided Court, 202 U. S. 613. In this case the court struck down a Commission order commanding the reclassification of hay and straw to a lower-rated class. 36 Stat. 546, 551, 552; 49 U. S. C. §§ 1 (6), 15 (1), 15 (7) (1958. ed.). H. R. Rep. No. 923, 61st Cong., 2d Sess., 3.…
• United States v. Wilson, 235 F.2d 251 (2d Cir. 1956)
  …Note under 33 U.S.C.A. § 415. Sections 10, 12, 15 and 19 of the Act of 1899 3 were inconsistent with § 10 of the 1890 Act. It is true that this holding is in conflict with United States v. Wishkaw Boom Co., 9 Cir., 1905, 136 F. 42, appeal dismissed 202 U.S. 613, 26 S.Ct. 765, 50 L.Ed. 1171, upon which the Government relies. It was there said that § 10 of the 1890 Act, which prohibits both the creation and the continuance of an obstruction, is not inconsistent with § 10 of the later Act, which prohibits the…
• The City of Omaha v. The Omaha Water Co., 207 U.S. 584 (U.S. 1907)