EX PARTE : IN THE MATTER OF JAMES HAMILTON LEWIS, PETITIONER

Citator

Cited By

• Campbell v. United States, 224 U.S. 99 (U.S. 1912)
• Municipality of Ponce v. Roman Catholic Apostolic Church in Porto RICO, 210 U.S. 296 (U.S. 1908)
  …roduced in the margin.1 “We do not deem it necessary to analyze the text of the act of Congress to point out the inevitable result just stated, since the obvious meaning of the act is established by a decision heretofore rendered. Dones v. Urrutia, 202 U. S. 614. On appeal to this court the questions raised were fully argued in printed briefs, but were deeméd to be of such a frivolous character as not to require an opinion, and were hence disposed of per curiam, referring to the provisions of the statute an…
• Kent v. People of Porto RICO, 207 U.S. 113 (U.S. 1907)
  …d in the margin.1 We do not deem it necessary to analyze the text of the act [*117] of Congress to point out the inevitable result just stated, since the obvious meaning of the act is established by a decision heretofore rendered. Dones v. Urrutia, 202 U. S. 614. In that case Dones, who had been convicted and sentenced to death for murder, unsuccessfully sought release by habeas corpus at the hands of the Supreme Court of Porto Rico upon the identical ground presented in the assignment of error which we are…

Authorities Cited

• Mills v. Green, 159 U.S. 651 (U.S. 1895)
• Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U.S. 324 (U.S. 1904)
• Jones v. Montague, 194 U.S. 147 (U.S. 1904)
• Sec. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Prewitt, 200 U.S. 446 (U.S. 1906)