FRANK D. ZELL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,

v.

THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

Citator

Cited By

• Peoples Bank of Jacksonville v. Bridge, 94 Fla. 474 (Fla. 1927)
  …name, the mere fact that it was not designated in the pleading as trustee became a matter of no substance or consequence. In support of its contentions in this regard, appellee cites Fink v. Bay Shore Terminal Co., 144 Fed. 837, 75 CCA 665 (affirmed 203 U. S. 577, 51 L. Ed. 235) ; Kerreson v. Stewart, 93 U. S. 155, 163, 23 L. Ed. 843; Young v. Whitney, 18 Fla. 54; Schuster v. Crawford, 199 S. W. 327; 23 Am. & Eng. Encyc. of Law, 823; 22 Standard Encyc. of Proc. 154-5; see also in this connection 2 R. C. L. 6…
• The Raithmoor, 241 U.S. 166 (U.S. 1916)
• The Winnebago, 205 U.S. 354 (U.S. 1907)
  …to build a ship is a maritime contract, and therefore can be enforced only in admiralty, but as late as this term,- in Graham v. Morton Transportation Company, this contention was overruled upon the authority of the previous decisions of this court. 203 U. S. 577. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Michigan are Affirmed.…