W. J. LAFFOON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
J. F. KERNER ET AL.

U.S. | 1906-10-22
No. 38
203 U.S. 579 Supreme Court of the United States (1906) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. California Consolidated Mining Company v. Manley, Sheriff, et al., post, and cases cited.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Romig v. Gillett, 205 U.S. 535 (U.S. 1907)
    …Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, and cases cited in California Consolidated Mining Co. v. Manley, 203 U. S. 579.…
  • The City of Omaha v. The Omaha Water Co., 207 U.S. 584 (U.S. 1907)
    …Per Curiam. Appeal dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Boom Company v. United States, 202 [*585] U. S. 613; California Consolidated Mining Company v. Manley, 203 U. S. 579. Certiorari denied. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company v. Osborne, 146 U. S. 354; McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Forsythe v. Hammond, 166 U. S. 506. Mr. John L. Webster and Mr. Carl C. Wright for appellants. Mr. Lucius H. Beers, Mr. Howard M…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw