W. S. KEEL, JR., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
E. E. DOUVILLE

U.S. | 1906-11-05
No. 68
203 U.S. 583 Supreme Court of the United States (1906) Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on the authority of Cornell v. Green, 163 U. S. 75, and cases cited.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U.S. 60 (U.S. 1917)
  • Willcox v. Consol. Gas Co., 212 U.S. 19 (U.S. 1909)
  • Louisville GAS & Elec. Co. v. Coleman, 277 U.S. 32 (U.S. 1928)
    …e or less may affect vitally not only the power and duties of the municipality, but the rights and liabilities of persons resident therein. Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U. S. 22; Budd v. New York, 143 U. S. 517, 548; Moeschen v. Tenement House Department, 203 U. S. 583; Northwestern, Laundry Col v. Des Moines, 239 U. S. 486, 495; Marcus Brown Co. v. Feldman, 256 U. S. 170, 198; Packard v. Banton, 264 U. S. 140, 143; Radice v. New York, 264 U. S. 292, 296. Compare the statutory provisions in Arkansas, Crawford & M…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw