WILLIAM SOBEY, PETITIONER,
v.
WILFORD H. HOLSCLAW
WILLIAM SOBEY, PETITIONER,
WILFORD H. HOLSCLAW
203 U.S. 594
Supreme Court of the United States (1906)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hertz v. Woodman, 218 U.S. 205 (U.S. 1910)…v. Marion Trust Co., 143 Fed. Rep. 301; United States v. Stephenson, not yet reported. In both cases' the decision was adverse to the contention of the United States. The first was affirmed by this court without opinion, by an evenly divided court, 203 U. S. 594, and, in the second, an application by the United States for á writ of certiorari was denied. 212 U. S. 527. It is further contended that, if not concluded by its own decisions, it was bound to follow the judgmeiits of this court in Eidman v. Tilghm…