STEVE MARKO AND MADELEINE MARKO, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
DAVID HOCHMAN AND ERNESTINE HOCHMAN, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1964-09-22
No. 64-21
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
167 So. 2d 333 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1964)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff below from an adverse final decree. On a prior appeal (Marko v. Hochman, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 507) we reversed a summary judgment against the plaintiffs, and in favor of the defendants on their counterclaim, and remanded the cause for trial, following which a similar decree was entered by the chancellor, upon resolving the issues in favor of the defendants. On examining the briefs and record we conclude that the chancellor’s decree is adequately supported by the evidence, and that no reversible error has been made to appear.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw