KNUDSEN-FERGUSON FRUIT COMPANY, PETITIONER,

v.

MICHIGAN CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Swift & Co. v. Columbia Ry., 17 F.2d 46 (4th Cir. 1927)
  …, for it has paid the rates charged by plaintiff, and there is evidence to support the trial judge’s conclusion that it paid them voluntarily. Knudsen-Ferguson Fruit Co. v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. R. Co. (C. C. A. 7th) 149 F. 973, certiorari denied 204 U. S. 671, 27 S. Ct. 786, 51 L. Ed. 672; Hardaway v. Southern Ry. Co., 90 S. C. 475, 73 S. E. 1020, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 266. See note to 18 L. R. A. (N. S.) 124. There, was no error, and the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. Affirmed.…
• Bradshaw v. The Va., 176 F.2d 526 (4th Cir. 1949)
  …so low as to enable her to avoid collision with other vessels which, perchance, might have been navigating without lights. We decline to so hold. See The Kaiserin Maria Theresa, 2 Cir., 149 F. 97, 99, certiorari denied, Palson v. North German Lloyd, 204 U.S. 671, 27 S.Ct. 786, 51 L.Ed. 673; The John H. Starin, 2 Cir., 122 F. 236, certiorari denied 190 U.S. 559, 23 S.Ct. 854, 47 L.Ed. 1184. A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. Chesapeake Steamship Co., 4 Cir., 101 F. 2d 599, and The William A. Paine, 6 Cir., 39 F. 2…
• Aron v. Pa. R. Co., 80 F.2d 100 (2d Cir. 1935)
  …re any party can recover under the act, he must show, not merely the wrong of the carrier, but that that wrong has in fact operated to his injury.” In Knudsen-Ferguson Fruit Co. v. Michigan Cent. R. Co. (C.C.A. 8) 148 F. 968, 974, certiorari denied 204 U.S. 671, 27 S.Ct. 786, 51 L.Ed. 672, the court held a mere violation by the carrier in making a charge did not thereby give the one who paid it a cause of action. It said: “To support a recovery under this section [(8) 49 U.S.C.A. § 8], there must be a show…