WILLIAM COUTURE, JR., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,

v.

THE UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Celestine, 215 U.S. 278 (U.S. 1909)
  …had. been hasty. See, upon the general questions discussed, United States v. Mullin, 71 Fed. Rep. 682; Rainbow v. Young, 161 Fed. Rep. 835; State v. Columbia George, 39 Oregon, 127; State v. Columbia George, 201 U. S. 641; Couture v. United States, 207 U. S. 581; Toy Toy v. Hopkins, 212 U. S. 542. The judgment is Reversed.…
• United States v. Pelican, 232 U.S. 442 (U.S. 1914)
  …rol of Congress for all governmental purposes, relating to the guardianship and protection of the Indians, is not open to controversy. United States v. Rickert, 188 U. S. 432, 437; McKay v. Kalyton, 204 U. S. 458, 466, 468; Couture v. United States, 207 U. S. 581; United States v. Celestine, 215 U. S. 278, 290, 291; United States v. Sutton, 215 U. S. 291; Tiger v. Western Investment Co., 221 U. S. 286, 315, 316; Hallowell v. United States, 221 U. S. 317; United States v. Wright, 229 U. S. 226, 237. Thus, in…
• United States v. Sutton, 215 U.S. 291 (U.S. 1909)
  …96] section withdrawing any other jurisdiction thau that named in- Draper v. United, States, undoubtedly Congress has the right to forbid the introduction of liquor and to provide punishment for any violation thereof. Couture, Jr., v. United States, 207 U. S. 581. It is true that only a per curiam opinion was filed in that case, and the judgment was affirmed on the authority of United States v. Rickert, 188 U. S. 432; McKay v. Kalyton, 204 U. S. 458, but an examination of the record shows that its facts are…

Authorities Cited

• United States v. Rickert, 188 U.S. 432 (U.S. 1903)
• McKAY v. Kalyton, 204 U.S. 458 (U.S. 1907)