THE NEW YORK CONTINENTAL JEWELL FILTRATION COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
MARY E. WYNKOOP

U.S. | 1907-11-18
No. 362
207 U.S. 582 Supreme Court of the United States (1907) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Writ of error dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Code D. C., § 233; Walker v. United States, 4 Wall. 163; Thompson v. Butler, 95 17. S. 694; District of Columbia v. Gannon, 130 U. S. 229; Baltimore & Potomac Railroad Company v. Hopkins, 130 U. S. 210; United States ex rel. Lisle v. Lynch, 137 U. S. 280; United States ex rel. Taylor v. Taft, Secretary, 203 U. S. 461.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Lovell in Bankruptcy of Knight v. Newman & SON, 227 U.S. 412 (U.S. 1913)
    …tana Catholic Missions v. Missoula County, 200 U. S. 118, 126; Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Co. v. Bunker Hill and Sullivan Mining Co., 200 U. S. 613; Russell v. Russell, 200 U. S. 613; Bush v. Elliott, supra; Warder v. Cotton and Grant, 207 U. S. 582; Shulthis v. McDougal, supra. The trustee, for his recovery upon the bond, did not rely upon any right specially conferred upon him under the Federal statute which was the subject of controversy., and therefore a ground of jurisdiction. He sued to…
  • Cordova v. Grant, 248 U.S. 413 (U.S. 1919)
    …comity so far as the present case is concerned, there was no reason why the Court should not proceed to trial, and there is no reason why the present writ should not be dismissed as it was in Warder v. Loomis, 197 U. S. 619, and in Warder v. Cotton, 207 U. S. 582. It follows that some other questions argued cannot be diseussed. Writ of error dismissed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw