OREGON SHORT LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
ADDA MCMANUS, ETC.
OREGON SHORT LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
ADDA MCMANUS, ETC.
207 U.S. 583
Supreme Court of the United States (1907)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Writ of error dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U. S. 389; Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658; Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180; Michigan Sugar Company v. Michigan, 185 U. S. 112; Mutual Life Insurance Company v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291. See opinion below, 118 Mo. App. 152.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thompson v. Smith, 103 F.2d 936 (D.C. Cir. 1939)…be satisfied that the attesting witnesses were disinterested, intelligent and truthful. I think the instruction, as given, correctly states the law applicable to the situation and finds ample support in Robinson v. Duvall, 27 App.D.C. 535, affirmed 207 U.S. 583, 28 S.Ct. 260, 52 L.Ed. 351, and cases therein cited: The Berry Will Case, 93 Md. 560, 594, 49 A. 401; Brooke v. Townshend, 7 Gill 10, 27; Williams v. Lee, 47 Md. 321. (3) I am unable to assent to the proposition that caveatee’s prayer No. 5 is co…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Dower v. Richards, 151 U.S. 658 (U.S. 1894)
- Sayward v. Denny, 158 U.S. 180 (U.S. 1895)
- California Powder Works v. Davis, 151 U.S. 389 (U.S. 1894)
- Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. McGREW, 188 U.S. 291 (U.S. 1903)
- Mich. Sugar Co. v. Michigan, 185 U.S. 112 (U.S. 1902)