GEORGE C. LOCKLIN ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
GEORGE H. BUCK
GEORGE C. LOCKLIN ET AL., PETITIONERS,
GEORGE H. BUCK
209 U.S. 544
Supreme Court of the United States (1908)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dorman v. Friendly, 146 Fla. 732 (Fla. 1941)…ision of Federal Constitution.” In the body of the opinion in that same case it was said: “The minor child or children must in other words be in the jurisdiction of the court before their custody will be considered and adjudicated. Seeley v. Seeley, 209 U. S. 544, 52 L. Ed. 919, 28 Sup. Ct. 570; Kline v. Kline, 57 Iowa 386, 10 N. W. 825; Harris v. Harris, 115 N. C. 587, 20 S. E. 187; Brandon v. Brandon, 154 Ga. 661, 115 S. E. 115; Wilson v. Wilson, 136 Va. 643, 118 S. E. 270.” In the case of State ex rel. L…
-
Rice v. Melva S. Rice, 159 Fla. 637 (Fla. 1947)…PER CURIAM: The record and the briefs in this cause have been examined and the judgment appealed from is affirmed on authority of [*638] Dorman v. Friendly, 146 Fla. 732, 1 So. (2nd) 734; Seeley v. Seeley, 209 U. S. 544, 52 L. ed. 919, and Brandon v. Brandon, 154 Ga. 661, 115 S. E. 115. Affirmed. Thomas, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN, and SEBRING,, JJ., concur.…
-
Duquesne Warehouse Co. v. R.R. Ret. Bd. (brotherhood of Ry. & S.S. Clerks, 148 F.2d 473 (2d Cir. 1945)…two statutes are npt identical, this argument would not necessarily be sound even if the two sections were identically worded. United States v. Colorado & N. W. R. Co., 8 Cir., 157 F. 321, 330, 15 L.R.A.,N.S., 167, 13 Ann.Cas. 893 (certiorari denied 209 U.S. 544, 28 S.Ct. 570, 52 L.Ed. 919) construing the Safety Appliance Act, 45 U.S. C.A. § 1 et seq.; cf. South Chicago Co. v. Bassett, 309 U.S. 251, 259-261, 60 S.Ct. 544, 84 L.Ed. 732. (b) More important, the two sections are not identical. The Transportat…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence