FRANCIS FLOYD, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Ferguson v. State, 417 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 1982)
  …ing trial). The fact that a jury hears of an accomplice’s guilt does not necessarily constitute reversible error. See, e.g., Sanders v. State, 241 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); Walters v. State, 217 So. 2d 615 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969); Vitiello v. State, 167 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); Grisette v. State, 152 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963). Defendant’s final point on appeal concerns the testimony of Adolphus Archie, the “wheelman” who was allowed to plead to second degree murder for testifying. On direct examin…
• Lambert v. State, 169 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964)
  …on concerning his indigency until his trial commenced on April 25, 1963. This delay was inexcusable. To have directed a continuance under the circumstances would have enabled the defendant to “stymie the processes of the law.” See Vitiello v. State, 167 So. 2d 629 (Fla.App.1964). There is no merit to appellant’s contention that the trial was irregular because-continued to a conclusion after he voluntarily absented himself from the trial. See-Section 914.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.; Mulvey v. State, 41 So. 2…
• Moore v. State, 186 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)
  …PER CURIAM. The State has filed a petition for rehearing, pointing out that our decision in this case should be controlled by the decisions in Grisette v. State, Fla.App.1963, 152 So. 2d 498, and Vitiello v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So. 2d 629. In rendering our original opinion in this cause, these authorities were examined but found not to be applicable in the instant case, because in the cited cases no obj ection or motion was made for mistrial directed to the judge’s remarks on the gu…

Authorities Cited

• Alston v. State, 167 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964)
• Jackson v. State, 167 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964)