ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
CITY OF TYLER, TEXAS

U.S. | 1908-10-26
No. 159
212 U.S. 552 Supreme Court of the United States (1908) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Railway Company v. Fitzgerald, 160 U. S. 556; Moran v. Horsky, 178 U. S. 205; Johnson v. Risk, 137 U. S. 300-307; Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Wiggins Ferry Company, 119 U. S. 615; Eagan v. Hart, 165 U. S. 188.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • ST. Louis Sw. Ry. Co. v. City OF Tyler, 375 F.2d 938 (5th Cir. 1967)
    …he injunction heretofore granted on to wit; April 20th 1902, by the Judge of the District Court of Smith County, Texas * * * is hereby perpetuated * * See City of Tyler v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co., 99 Tex. 491, 91 S.W. 1, appeal dismissed 212 U.S. 552, 29 S.Ct. 684, 53 L.Ed. 649; City of Tyler v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co., Tex., 405 S.W. 2d 330. In 1889 the Texas legislature enacted a statute in these terms: “Every railroad company chartered by this State, or owning or operating any lin…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw