COULSON
v.
GOVERNMENT OF THE CANAL ZONE

U.S. | 1908-11-09
No. 187
212 U.S. 553 Supreme Court of the United States (1908) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Gov't OF The Canal Zone v. Ruben Antonio Yanez P. (Pinto), 590 F.2d 1344 (5th Cir. 1979)
    …heir own force. McConaughey v. Morrow, D.C. C.Z.Bal.Div.1922, 3 C.Z. 377, aff’d, 5 Cir., 279 F. 617, aff’d, 263 U.S. 39, 44 S.Ct. 78, 68 L.Ed. 153; Canal Zone v. Coulson, S.Ct., C.Z. 1907, 1 C.Z. 50, writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction, 212 U.S. 553, 29 S.Ct. 685, 53 L.Ed. 650; cf. United States v. Husband R. (Roach), 5 Cir. 1971, 453 F. 2d 1054. The right of confrontation is a fundamental requirement for a fair trial. Pointer v. Texas, 1965, 380 U.S. 400, 405, 88 S.Ct. 1065, 13 L.Ed.2d 923. We…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw