SHAW
v.
UNITED STATES
SHAW
UNITED STATES
212 U.S. 559
Supreme Court of the United States (1908)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Shaw v. United States, 141 Fed. Rep. 469; United States v. Shaw, 144 Fed. Rep. 329, and opinion of Board of General Appraisers, Shaw v. United States, 203 U. S. 591; American Sugar Refining Company v. United States, decided to-day, 211 U. S. 155.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Towne v. Eisner, 245 U.S. 418 (U.S. 1918)
-
B. Altman & Co. v. United States, 224 U.S. 583 (U.S. 1912)…rcuit Court of Appeals Act and operates to prevent an appeal here in cases really involving the Constitution of the United States or the construction of a treaty. The Government relies, in support of its motion to dismiss, on Shaw v. United States, 212 U. S. 559. In that case, however, the appeal was undertaken to be made directly from the Circuit Court because of an alleged deprivation of constitutional right, and because of the construction of a reciprocal agreement made with Italy under the Tariff Act of…
Authorities Cited
- Am. Sugar Ref. Co. v. United States, 211 U.S. 155 (U.S. 1908)
- Abram Rosenberger v. Harris, 203 U.S. 591 (U.S. 1906)
- Moritz Eisner v. Emilie Saxlehner, 203 U.S. 591 (U.S. 1906)