IN RE JONES
IN RE JONES
212 U.S. 561
Supreme Court of the United States (1908)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
Motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus dénied. •
[As to the right of the Texas & Pacific Railway Co. to remove a case, on the ground that it is a corporation organized under an act of Congress, see Matter of Dunn, ante, p. 374.]
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Baldwin Co. v. R. S. Howard Co., 256 U.S. 35 (U.S. 1921)…were reviewed by Chief Justice Fuller, speaking for the court, and in concluding the opinion he said: “In the light of the various details of the Act of February 20, 1905, and of the specific provisions of § 9, we were of opinion [Gaines v. Knecht, 212 U. S. 561] that proceedings under the act were governed by the same rules of practice and procedure as in the instance of patents, and the writ of error was accordingly dismissed. The same result must follow in the present case. Under § 4914 of the Revised St…
-
Moore v. United States Ex rel. Newcomb Motor Co., 216 U.S. 608 (U.S. 1910)…Per Curiam. The writ of error is dismissed for want of •jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U. S. 1; Rousseau v. Browne, 21 App. D. C. 73, 80; Johnson v. Mueser, 212 U. S. 284; Atkins v. Moore, 212 U. S. 285; Gaines v. Knecht, 212 U. S. 561; Same v. Same, 27 App. D. C. 530, 532; Taylor v. Taft, 203 U. S. 461; United States v. Lynch, 137 U. S. 280; Baltimore & Potomac R. R. Co. v. Hopkins, 130 U. S. 210, 226. The application for certiorari is also denied.…